| |
|
|
|
|
787 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019-6099 |
|
|
Tel: 212 728 8000 |
|
|
Fax: 212 728 8111 |
September 21, 2011
VIA EDGAR
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
|
|
|
| Attn: |
|
Jeffrey Riedler
Scot Foley
James Peklenk
Jennifer Riegel
Melissa Rocha
|
|
|
|
| Re: |
|
Clovis Oncology, Inc.
Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1
Filed August 31, 2011
File No. 333-175080 |
Ladies and Gentlemen:
On behalf of Clovis Oncology, Inc. (the “Company”), we hereby submit this supplemental
information in response to one of the comments from the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) received by letter dated September 13, 2011 relating to the
Company’s Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-175080) filed with
the Commission on August 31, 2011 (the “Registration Statement”). We have recited this comment in
bold type and have followed the comment with the Company’s proposed response. Capitalized terms
used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in Amendment No. 2.
Please note that on September 21, 2011, the board of directors of the Company approved a 1 for
2.9 reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”). The Reverse
Stock Split will become effective upon the filing of an amendment to the Company’s Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, with the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware, following receipt by the Company of the requisite approval by the stockholders of the
Company. The numbers in this letter do not reflect the Reverse Stock
New York Washington Paris London Milan
Rome Frankfurt Brussels
in alliance with Dickson Minto W.S., London and Edinburgh
Securities and Exchange Commission
September 21, 2011
Page 2
Split. The Company expects that the numbers included in Amendment No. 3 to the Registration
Statement will reflect the Reverse Stock Split.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates
Stock-Based Compensation, page 47
1. We may have additional comments on your accounting for stock compensation and related
disclosure once you have disclosed an estimated offering price. Once you have disclosed an
estimated offering price, please provide an updated listing of all stock option grants and other
equity transactions through the date of your filing and provide quantitative and qualitative
disclosures explaining the difference between the estimated offering price and the fair value of
each equity issuance.
Response: The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and proposes supplementing its
disclosure on the top of page 53 of Amendment No. 2 to include the following:
“On September 21, 2011, we and representatives of the underwriters determined the price
range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus. The midpoint of the price range set
forth on the cover page of this prospectus is $4.83 per share, as compared to management’s
most recent common stock valuation of $3.80 per share completed as of June 30, 2011. As is
typical in initial public offerings, the range set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus was not derived using a formal determination of fair value, but was determined
based upon discussions between us and the underwriters based on prevailing market conditions
and estimates of our business potential. In addition to the difference in purpose and
methodology, we believe that the difference in estimated value between the midpoint of the
price range and management’s determination of the estimated fair value of our common stock as of
June 30, 2011 is primarily the result of the following factors:
| |
• |
|
The contemporaneous valuation prepared as of June 30, 2011 contained
multiple liquidity scenarios, including an initial public offering with an
anticipated completion date of October 1, 2011 and two scenarios that assumed we
remained as a private company for an extended period of time. If we had considered
only the October 1, 2011 initial public offering scenario with 100% probability,
the contemporaneous valuation would have resulted in a fair value determination of
$4.30 per share, representing a discount of 11% from the midpoint of
the range. |
| |
| |
• |
|
We believe that is it reasonable to expect that the completion of an
initial public offering could increase the value of our common stock as a result of
the significant increase in our liquidity as well as the ability to buy and sell
these
securities. However, it is not possible to measure the potential increase in value
with precision or certainty. |
- 2 -
Securities and Exchange Commission
September 21, 2011
Page 3
| |
• |
|
We would also note that a number of the most-recently completed initial
public offerings by companies in the biotech and specialty pharmaceutical industries were completed at a
discount to the midpoint of their filing ranges. Therefore, it is
possible that the price at which this offering is completed
will be lower than the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus. |
During the period of July 1, 2011 through September 20, 2011, we granted options to purchase a
total of 596,885 shares of our common stock. All such options are unvested as of
September 20, 2011. These options have an exercise price of $3.80 per share, and we used
the June 30, 2011 common stock valuation prepared by management to calculate stock-based
compensation expense associated with these options. Based on the $4.83 midpoint of the
range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, the intrinsic value of these options
was $596,885, all of which related to unvested options."
As discussed with the Staff, the Company anticipates commencing its roadshow next week. Please
direct your questions or comments regarding this letter to the undersigned at (212) 728-8285 or
Peter H. Jakes at (212) 728-8230. Thank you for your assistance.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ William H. Gump
William H. Gump
|
|
|
| cc: |
|
Patrick J. Mahaffy
President and Chief Executive Officer
Clovis Oncology, Inc.
2525 28th Street, Suite 100
Boulder, Colorado 80301
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cheston J. Larson, Esq.
Divakar Gupta, Esq.
Latham & Watkins, LLP
12636 High Bluff Drive, Suite 400
San Diego, California 92130 |
- 3 -