Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Fair Value Measures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASURES

(8) FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company’s financial instruments included cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, a note receivable, and a line of credit with Wells Fargo. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates fair value due to the short-term maturities of these financial instruments. The carrying value of the debt balances approximate fair value because the variable interest rates reflect current market rates.

 

In addition, as discussed in Note 9, management records an impairment on the note receivable if the fair value of the underlying collateral is less than the carrying amount. The assets that collateralize the note receivable include real property, interests in entities that own real property, and 80 shares of the Company’s stock that carry a restrictive legend until two months after the note receivable is paid in full. Management determined that the fair value of the collateral exceeded the carrying value of the note receivable at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

Fair Value Measurements

 

At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the following assets and liabilities were measured at fair value on a recurring basis using the level of inputs shown (in thousands):

 

  Fair Value Measurements Using:
  December 31, 2014  Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs  Level 3 Inputs 
Money market funds included in cash equivalents $374 $          374  —   — 

 

 

  Fair Value Measurements Using:
  December 31, 2013  Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs  Level 3 Inputs 
Money market funds included in cash equivalents $163 $        163  —   — 

 

 

Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements

 

The Company also measures the fair value of certain assets on a non-recurring basis, generally quarterly, annually or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. These assets include goodwill, intangible assets, property and equipment, asset purchase credits, and collateral securing the note receivable.

 

The following tables presents assets held as of December 31, 2013 (none in 2014), measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis using the level of inputs shown at the time of impairment (in thousands).

 

  Fair Value Measurements Using:
  December 31, 2013  Level 1 Inputs  Level 2 Inputs  Level 3 Inputs 
Goodwill $—   —   —  $— 
iFrogz trademark $7,038   —   —  $7,038 

 

As discussed in Note 5, at December 31, 2013, management performed an impairment analysis over each asset and ultimately recorded an impairment of goodwill of $1,484 and an impairment of the iFrogz trademark of $9,762. Thus, the balances in the table above reflect the fair value at December 31, 2013. The fair value of goodwill and the iFrogz trademark were determined using various valuation methods, including the income and market approaches. Under the income approach, the estimate of the present value of expected future cash flows was based on discount rates which incorporate a risk premium to take into account the risks inherent in those expected cash flows. The expected cash flows were estimated using available historical operating data projected into the future based on the Company’s current expectations. Various market approaches were utilized to determine appropriate royalty rates applicable to the valuation of the iFrogz trademark, to determine appropriate comparable company market multiples to estimate the value of the ZAGG Domestic reporting unit, and to estimate the overall value of the consolidated entity.

 

  Fair Value Measurements Using: 
  December 31, 2012  Level 1 Inputs  Level 2 Inputs  Level 3 Inputs 
Goodwill $1,484   —   —  $1,484 
EarPollution trademark $2,383   —   —  $2,383 

 

As discussed in Note 5, at December 31, 2012, management performed an impairment analysis over each asset and ultimately recorded an impairment of goodwill of $5,441 and an impairment of the EarPollution trademark of $5,917. Thus, the balances in the table above reflect the fair value at December 31, 2012. The fair value of goodwill and the EarPollution trademark were determined using various valuation methods, including the income and market approaches. Under the income approach, the estimate of the present value of expected future cash flows was based on discount rates which incorporate a risk premium to take into account the risks inherent in those expected cash flows. The expected cash flows were estimated using available historical operating data projected into the future based on the Company’s current expectations. Various market approaches were utilized to determine appropriate royalty rates applicable to the valuation of the EarPollution trademark, to determine appropriate comparable company market multiples to estimate the value of the iFrogz reporting unit, and to estimate the overall value of the consolidated entity.