Note 7 - Equity Method Investments and Variable Interest Entities
3 Months Ended
Nov. 30, 2011
Equity Method Investments Disclosure [Text Block]
Note 7 — Equity Method Investments and Variable Interest Entities

As is common in the engineering and construction industries, we execute certain contracts jointly with third parties through joint ventures, limited partnerships and limited liability companies. We evaluate each partnership and joint venture to determine whether the entity is a VIE. Most of the entities we assess are incorporated or unincorporated joint ventures formed by us and our partner(s) for the purpose of executing a project or program for a client, such as a government agency or a commercial enterprise, and are generally dissolved upon completion of the project or program. Our partnerships or joint ventures are typically characterized by a 50% or less non-controlling ownership or participation interest, with decision making and distribution of expected gains and losses typically being proportionate to the ownership or participation interest. Many of the partnership and joint venture agreements require little or no equity investment by the joint venture partners but provide for capital calls to fund operations, as necessary, and may require subordinated financial support from the joint venture partners such as letters of credit, financial guarantees or obligations to fund losses incurred by the joint venture. Such funding is infrequent and is not anticipated to be material.

Under ASC 810-10, a partnership or joint venture is considered a VIE if either (a) the total equity investment is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, (b) characteristics of a controlling financial interest are missing (either the ability to make decisions through voting or other rights, the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity or the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity), or (c) the voting rights of the equity holders are not proportional to their obligations to absorb the expected losses of the entity and/or their rights to receive the expected residual returns of the entity, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights.

If the entity is determined to be a VIE, we assess whether we are the primary beneficiary and whether we need to consolidate the entity. ASC 810-10, as amended by ASU 2009-17, requires companies to utilize a qualitative approach to determine if it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. A company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary and must consolidate its partnerships and joint ventures if the company has both (1) the power to direct the economically significant activities of the entity and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of, or the right to receive benefits from, the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The contractual agreements that define the ownership structure and equity investment at risk, distribution of profits and losses, risks, responsibilities, indebtedness, voting rights and board representation of the respective parties are used to determine if the entity is a VIE and whether we are the primary beneficiary and must consolidate the entity. Additionally, we consider all parties that have direct or implicit variable interests when determining whether we are the primary beneficiary. Upon the occurrence of certain events outlined in ASC 810-10, we reassess our initial determination of whether the entity is a VIE and whether consolidation is required. If consolidation of the VIE or joint venture is not required, we generally account for these joint ventures using the equity method of accounting with our share of the earnings (losses) from these investments reflected in one line item on the consolidated statement of operations.

The majority of our partnerships and joint ventures are VIEs because the total equity investment is typically nominal and not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. However, some of the VIEs do not meet the consolidation requirements of ASC 810-10 because we are not deemed to be the primary beneficiary. Some of our VIEs have debt, but the debt is typically non-recourse in nature. At times, our participation in VIEs requires agreements to provide financial or performance assurances to clients.

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, we prospectively adopted ASU 2009-17. As a result of our adoption of ASU 2009-17, we deconsolidated several VIEs as we determined we were no longer the primary beneficiary under ASC 810-10. The impact of the deconsolidation on our consolidated statements of operations was minimal. The impacts on our consolidated balance sheet upon adoption of ASU 2009-17 were a decrease to assets of $56.3 million and a decrease to liabilities of $35.2 million.

ASC 810-10, as amended, requires that we continuously assess whether we are the primary beneficiary of our VIEs. Prior to the amendment, reassessment of whether we were the primary beneficiary was required only upon the occurrence of certain events. Accordingly, we analyzed all of our VIEs at November 30, 2011, and classified them into two groups:

 
●
Joint ventures that should be consolidated because we hold the majority voting interest or because they are VIEs and we are the primary beneficiary; and

 
●
Joint ventures that should not be consolidated because we hold a minority voting interest or because they are VIEs, but we are not the primary beneficiary.

Consolidated Joint Ventures

The following table presents the total assets and liabilities of our consolidated joint ventures (in thousands):

   
November 30,
2011
   
August 31,
2011
 
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 60,162     $ 78,577  
Net accounts receivable
    29,616       7,537  
Other current assets
    163,624       174,584  
Non-current assets
    55,033       50,038  
Total assets
  $ 308,435     $ 310,736  
                 
Accounts and subcontractors payable
  $ 63,336     $ 91,293  
Billings in excess of costs and accrued earnings
    27,723       27,831  
Accrued expenses and other
    118,460       97,102  
Total liabilities
  $ 209,519     $ 216,226  

Total revenues of the consolidated ventures were $206.0 and $153.2 million for the three months ended November 30, 2011, and 2010, respectively.

For the three months ended November 30, 2011 and 2010, there were no material changes in our ownership interests in our consolidated joint ventures. In addition, we have immaterial amounts of other comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interests.

Generally, the assets of our consolidated joint ventures are restricted for use only in the joint venture and are not available for general corporate purposes.

Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

We use the equity method of accounting for our unconsolidated joint ventures. Under GAAP, use of the equity method is appropriate in circumstances in which an investor has the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of an investee. GAAP presumes significant influence exists as a result of holding an investment of 20% or more in the voting stock of an investee, absent predominant evidence to the contrary. Management must exercise its judgment in determining whether a minority holder has the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of an investee. Under the equity method, we recognize our proportionate share of the net earnings of these joint ventures in two line items, Income from 20% Investment in Westinghouse, net of income taxes and earnings (losses) from other unconsolidated entities, in our consolidated statements of operations.

Investment in Westinghouse

Our most significant investment accounted for under the equity method is our wholly-owned, special purpose subsidiary Nuclear Energy Holdings’ (NEH) 20% equity interest in Westinghouse. Factors supporting our assessment that we have the ability to exercise significant influence within Westinghouse include: (i) our CEO’s position as one of three Directors on the Boards of Directors of the companies comprising Westinghouse and ongoing participation in these Boards’ deliberations; (ii) NEH’s right to appoint a representative to an advisory committee (the Owner Board), whose functions are to advise as to the administration and supervision of matters regarding the Westinghouse Group and provide advice on other matters, including supervision of the business, and our ongoing exercise of that right; (iii) the material number of consortium agreements we have entered into with Westinghouse over time; (iv) our participation in periodic Westinghouse management reviews; and (v) the requirement that the Owner Board review and approve certain defined business transactions. We review the accounting treatment for this investment on a quarterly basis. Based upon our analysis of these factors and our expectations for the future, we concluded that no change from the equity method of accounting is warranted at November 30, 2011.

In the event we conclude we can no longer account for this investment under the equity method, our Investment in Westinghouse would be treated as a cost method investment with the initial basis being our previous carrying amount of the investment under the equity method of accounting offset by our share of Westinghouse’s accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) then recorded in our accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Under the cost method of accounting, we would no longer include our proportionate share of Westinghouse’s earnings in our statements of operations. Dividends relating to Westinghouse’s earnings from the date we are under the cost method would be reflected as earnings in our statement of operations. Dividends received in excess of our share of those earnings would result in a reduction of the carrying amount of the investment.

Westinghouse maintains its accounting records for reporting to its majority owner, Toshiba, on a calendar quarter basis with a March 31 fiscal year end. Financial information about Westinghouse’s operations is available to us for Westinghouse’s calendar quarter periods. We record our 20% interest of the equity earnings (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss) reported to us by Westinghouse two months in arrears of our current periods. Under this policy, Westinghouse’s operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010, are included in our financial results for the three months ended November 30, 2011, and 2010, respectively.

Summarized unaudited income statement information for Westinghouse, before applying our Westinghouse Equity Interest, was as follows (in thousands):

   
Three Months Ended
 
Statements of Operations
 
September 30,
2011
(unaudited)
   
September 30,
2010
(unaudited)
 
Revenues
  $ 1,082,174     $ 1,105,057  
Gross profit
    221,274       232,350  
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
    44,626       29,308  
Net income attributable to shareholders
    42,814       20,286  

Our investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities, joint ventures, and limited partnerships and our overall percentage ownership of these ventures that are accounted for under the equity method were as follows (in thousands, except percentages):

   
Ownership
   
November 30,
August 31,
 
   
Percentage
   
2011
   
2011
 
Investment in Westinghouse
    20 %   $ 997,306     $ 999,035  
Other
    23% - 50 %     15,395       14,768  
Total investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities, joint ventures, and limited partnerships
          $ 1,012,701     $ 1,013,803  

Earnings (losses) from unconsolidated entities, net of income taxes, are summarized as follows (in thousands):

 
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
2011
   
2010
 
Investment in Westinghouse, net of income taxes of $3,297 and $1,578, respectively
  $ 5,266     $ 2,479  
Other unconsolidated entities, net of income taxes of $1,057 and $198, respectively
    1,687       393  
Total earnings (losses) from unconsolidated entities, net income of taxes
  $ 6,953     $ 2,872