Note 6 - Goodwill, Franchise Rights and Trademarks
12 Months Ended
Dec. 28, 2014
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Text Block]

(6) Goodwill, Franchise Rights and Trademarks


During the fourth quarter of each year, the Company completes an analysis to determine if goodwill and certain intangible assets are impaired as of the balance sheet date. The Company bases its fair value estimates on assumptions it believes to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain.


Franchise Rights


In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 350, owned franchise rights that have been determined to have indefinite lives must be reviewed for potential impairment annually and when triggering events are detected. No impairment charges related to franchise rights were recognized in fiscal years 2014, 2013 or 2012.


To determine the fair value of acquired franchise rights, the Company used a multi-period excess earnings approach. This approach involves projecting after-royalty future earnings, discounting those earnings using an appropriate market discount rate and subtracting a contributory charge for net working capital, property and equipment, assembled workforce and customer relationships to arrive at excess earnings attributable to these franchise rights. The Company calculated the present value of cash flows generated from future excess earnings and determined that the fair values exceeded the financial statement carrying value as of December 28, 2014.


Trademarks


In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 350, owned trademarks that have been determined to have indefinite lives must be reviewed for potential impairment annually and when triggering events are detected. To determine the fair value of the Mitchell’s trademarks, including Mitchell’s Fish Market, Columbus Fish Market, Mitchell’s Steakhouse and Cameron’s Steakhouse, the Company used a relief-from-royalty valuation approach. This approach assumes that in lieu of ownership, a third party would be willing to pay a royalty in order to exploit the related benefits of these types of assets. This approach is dependent on a number of factors, including estimates of future revenue growth and trends, royalty rates in the category of intellectual property, discount rates and other variables. The Company did not perform an impairment test as of December 28, 2014, as the Mitchell’s trademarks were recorded as assets held for sale (lower of carrying amount or fair value, less costs to sell).


As discussed in Note (3), during the third quarter of fiscal year 2014, a $7.3 impairment loss related to the trademarks of the Mitchell’s Restaurants was recorded. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013, a $400 thousand loss on impairment of an ancillary trademark not expected to be used was recorded.  No impairment charge related to trademarks was recognized in fiscal year 2012.


Goodwill


No impairment charges related to goodwill were recognized in fiscal years 2014, 2013 or 2012. Goodwill increased $2.2 million during fiscal year 2014 due to the acquisition of the Austin, TX Ruth’s Chris Steak House restaurant.


In performing the fiscal year 2014 evaluation of goodwill impairment under FASB ASC Topic 350-20 Step 1, the Company compared the carrying value of the reporting unit, which is considered to be the steakhouse operating segment, to its fair value. Consistent with the valuation of restaurant operations, the Company utilized a multiple of EBITDA to approximate the fair value of the reporting unit for purposes of completing Step 1 of the evaluation. The Company considered EBITDA multiples of publicly held companies, including its own, as well as recent industry acquisitions. For reporting units whose estimated fair value exceeded its carrying value, no impairment is recorded. As of December 28, 2014, the estimated fair values of all reporting units substantially exceeded their respective carrying values.


If a reporting unit’s fair value did not exceed its carrying value as the balance sheet date, the Company would have completed Step 2 of the evaluation by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with the net asset value of the reporting unit. The Company would have calculated the implied fair value by allocating the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the price paid to acquire the unit.


 The financial statement carrying values of the Company’s franchise rights, trademarks and goodwill were as follows (amounts in thousands):


           

Franchise Rights

   

Trademarks

 

Balance as of December 29, 2013

          $ 32,200     $ 10,276  

Balance as of December 28, 2014

          $ 32,418     $ 118  

   

Gross Goodwill

   

Accumulated Impairment Losses

   

Net Carrying Value of Goodwill

 

Balance as of December 29, 2013

  $ 55,469     $ (33,372 )   $ 22,097  

Balance as of December 28, 2014

  $ 57,665     $ (33,372 )   $ 24,293  

Any losses are included in “loss on impairment” in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. When the operating results of closed or sold restaurants are reclassified to discontinued operations, the impairment losses related to the assets of those closed or sold restaurants are also reclassified to discontinued operations.