GOING CONCERN AND MANAGEMENT'S PLANS |
6 Months Ended |
|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2017 | |
| Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract] | |
| GOING CONCERN AND MANAGEMENT'S PLANS | NOTE 3 – GOING CONCERN AND MANAGEMENT’S PLANS
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”), which contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern, which assumes the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The Company has experienced net losses from continuing operations of $393,673, and $556,508 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively. At June 30, 2017, the Company had a working capital deficit of $271,433, and an accumulated deficit of $275,579. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and to operate in the normal course of business.
Through August 5, 2016, the Company was dependent on the Marketing Agreement with MFHC, (the Company and MFHC agreed to cancel the Marketing Agreement which generated 100% of the Company’s revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, as a result of the sale by MFHC of substantially all of their assets) and is now dependent on the sale of our services to third parties and the Consulting Agreement. On May 2, 2017, the Company received a demand that all monies paid pursuant to the Consulting Agreement be returned on the basis that an injunction entered against related parties prevented the performance of the Consulting Agreement by the Company. On May 26, 2017, the Company and the Moores were named as Defendants in an action filed in the Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida in and for County of Miami-Dade that includes a demand that all monies paid pursuant to the Consulting Agreement be returned. The Company believes the claim is frivolous and without merit, as well as not providing sufficient cause for the Agreement to be terminated (See Note 8), as the injunction entered by the Superior Court of California does not apply to the Company. The Company has filed a countersuit for breach of contract, requesting specific performance and damages, and will vigorously defend its rights under the Consulting Agreement.
Management’s Plans
The Company’s plans include the realization of the Consulting Agreement to provide the Company with working capital. The Company’s plans also include setting up an alliance (the “Alliance”). On April 2, 2013, The Company executed a 10 Year Supply Agreement with GN Hearing Care Corporation, DBA as GN Resound (“GN Resound”), one of the world’s leading manufacturers of hearing devices. This supply agreement enables the Company to offer hearing aids to independent hearing aid practitioners at a discount to the regular wholesale price, while still permitting the Company to profit from said sale between the independent hearing aid practitioners and GN Resound. Alliance members will then be able to sell those hearing devices, whether private label or GN Resound branded, manufactured and shipped by GN ReSound under the Alliance program to their clients. |