Commitments and Contingencies |
9 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct. 30, 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commitments and Contingencies |
In a complaint filed in January 2017 by Mr. Jorge Chacon in the Superior Court for the State of California for the County of Orange, certain subsidiaries of the Company were named as defendants in a representative action alleging violations of California state wage and hour statutes and other labor standards. The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary damages and attorneys’ fees. In July 2018, former associate Ms. Christie Carr filed suit in Alameda County Superior Court for the State of California naming certain subsidiaries of the Company as defendants in a representative action alleging violations of California State wage and hour statutes and other labor standard violations. The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary damages and attorneys’ fees. In August 2018, former associate Ms. Leticia Rosete filed suit in Los Angeles County Superior Court for the State of California naming certain subsidiaries of the Company as defendants in a representative action alleging violations of California state wage and hour statutes and other labor standard violations (including claims for discrimination, harassment, retaliation, etc.). On September 8, 2021, the Rosete case was settled. On January 29, 2019, Mr. Jorge Chacon filed a second representative action in the Superior Court for the State of California for the County of Orange alleging violations of California state wages and hour statutes and other labor standard violations, which was removed to federal court by the Company and is now pending in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary damages and attorneys' fees. In June 2021, a portion of Mr. Chacon’s claims in this action were certified as a class action. The Company is vigorously defending itself against these claims and, as of October 30, 2021, has established an estimated liability based on its best estimate of the outcome of the matters. The Company is subject to various other claims and contingencies arising out of the normal course of business. Management believes that the ultimate liability arising from such claims and contingencies, if any, is not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||