The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are categorized within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy due to the short-term nature of these balances. The table below illustrates information about fair value relating to the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, as well as the fair value of contingent contracts that represent financial instruments (in thousands). | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | September 30, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value | Money market funds(1) | $ | 73,229 |
| | $ | 73,229 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| Japan ABL Facility(2) | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 14,969 |
| | $ | 14,969 |
| Standby letters of credit(3) | $ | 933 |
| | $ | 933 |
| | $ | 1,030 |
| | $ | 1,030 |
|
| | (1) | The carrying value of the money market funds approximates fair value as the funds are highly liquid and short-term in nature. The funds seek to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share, and the market value per share of these funds are available in active markets. As such, they are categorized within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The money market funds accrue dividends, which are reinvested and reflected in the carrying value as of September 30, 2016. |
| | (2) | The carrying value of the amount outstanding under the Japan ABL Facility approximates the fair value due to the short-term nature of this obligation. The fair value of this debt is categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 2 for information on the Company's credit facilities, including certain risks and uncertainties related thereto. |
| | (3) | The carrying value of the Company's standby letters of credit approximates the fair value as they represent the Company’s contingent obligation to perform in accordance with the underlying contracts. There were no amounts outstanding under these letters of credit as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The fair value of this contingent obligation is categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. |
|