The Company and a Summary of its Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2021
Organization Consolidation And Presentation Of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Nature of Operations

(a)

Nature of Operations

On August 29, 2019, DermTech, Inc., formerly known as Constellation Alpha Capital Corp, (the “Company”), and DermTech Operations, Inc., formerly known as DermTech, Inc., (“DermTech Operations”), consummated the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 29, 2019, by and among the Company, DT Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”), and DermTech Operations. The Company refers to this agreement, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of August 1, 2019, as the Merger Agreement. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub merged with and into DermTech Operations, with DermTech Operations surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company refers to this transaction as the Business Combination. In connection with and two days prior to the completion of the Business Combination, the Company domesticated from the British Virgin Islands to Delaware. DermTech Operations changed its name from DermTech, Inc. to DermTech Operations, Inc. shortly before the completion of the Business Combination. On August 29, 2019, immediately following the completion of the Business Combination, the Company changed its name from Constellation Alpha Capital Corp. to DermTech, Inc., and then effected a one-for-two reverse stock split of its common stock (“Reverse Stock Split”).

The Company is a molecular diagnostic company developing and marketing its Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (“CLIA”) laboratory services including molecular pathology tests to facilitate the diagnosis of dermatologic conditions including melanoma. The Company has developed a proprietary, non-invasive technique for sampling the surface layers of the skin using an adhesive patch called the DermTech Smart Sticker™ (the “Smart Sticker”) in order to collect individual biological information for commercial applications in the medical diagnostic field.

From the end of the first quarter of 2020 and through the fourth quarter of 2021, there has been a widespread worldwide impact from the COVID-19 pandemic. The Company is considered an essential business due to the importance of early melanoma detection, which has allowed the Company’s CLIA laboratory to remain fully operational. The Company has implemented additional safety measures in accordance with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) and other guidance within its CLIA laboratory operations. Additionally, the Company has transitioned administrative functions to predominantly remote work. Beginning in March 2020 and continuing through the fourth quarter of 2021, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has reduced patient access to clinician offices for in-person testing and reduced access by the Company’s sales force for in-office sales calls, which has resulted in a reduced volume of billable samples received during the fourth quarter of 2021 relative to the Company’s pre-pandemic expectations. The Company expects the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic to continue to adversely impact billable sample volume until patient access to in-person testing fully resumes, in-office access by the Company’s sales force returns to pre-pandemic levels, or telemedicine options are more widely adopted. Additionally, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected and will continue to negatively affect the Company’s pharmaceutical customers’ clinical trials. The extent of such effect on the Company’s future revenue is uncertain and will depend on the duration and extent of the effects of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s pharmaceutical customers’ clinical trials.

Basis of Presentation

(b)

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of DermTech, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions among the consolidated entity have been eliminated in consolidation. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, (“U.S. GAAP”). In the opinion of management, all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation, have been included.

Revision to Prior Period Financial Statements

(c)

Revision to Prior Period Financial Statements  

As discussed under the heading “Revision to Prior Period Financial Statements” in Note 1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 13, 2021, during the course of preparing the quarterly report Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2021, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC Staff”) issued a public statement entitled “Staff Statement on Accounting and Reporting Considerations for Warrants issued by Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (“SPACs”)” (the “SEC Statement”). The SEC Statement highlighted challenges associated with the accounting for complex financial instruments that may be common in SPACs, specifically accounting for warrants issued in connection with a SPAC’s formation and initial registered offering. In the SEC Statement, the SEC Staff expressed its view that certain terms and conditions common to SPAC warrants may require the warrants to be classified as liabilities on the SPAC’s balance sheet as opposed to equity.

The Company previously issued warrants to purchase common stock in public and private placement offerings consummated on June 23, 2017 (the “SPAC Warrants”), which were originally classified as equity in the Company’s financial statements. As part of the aforementioned public offering, the Company issued 14,375,000 warrants (the “Public SPAC Warrants”) and as part of the aforementioned private placement offering, the Company issued 561,250 warrants (the “Private SPAC Warrants”). The SPAC Warrants have a five-year life from the date the Business Combination was consummated and every four SPAC Warrants entitle the holder to purchase one whole share of common stock at an exercise price of $23.00 per whole share. The Company’s SPAC Warrants were accounted for as equity within the Company’s previously reported consolidated balance sheets.

The Private SPAC Warrants are identical to the Public SPAC Warrants, but they (i) are exercisable either for cash or on a cashless basis at the holder’s option, (ii) are not redeemable by the Company as long as such warrants are held by the initial purchasers or their affiliates and permitted transferees, and (iii) may be subject to the limitations on exercise as specified in the warrant agreement.

Historically, the Private SPAC Warrants were recorded as a component of equity as opposed to liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets and the Company’s consolidated statements of operations did not include the subsequent non-cash changes in estimated fair value of the Private SPAC Warrants, based on our application of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging, Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (“ASC 815-40”). The views expressed in the recent SEC Statement were not consistent with the Company’s historical interpretation of the specific provisions within its warrant agreement and the Company’s application of ASC 815-40 to the warrant agreement. The Company reassessed its accounting for SPAC Warrants issued on June 23, 2017, in light of the SEC Staff’s published views. After discussion and evaluation, the Company concluded that, as a result of these differences in features between the Public SPAC Warrants and Private SPAC Warrants, the Private SPAC Warrants should be classified as liabilities, if still held by the original Private SPAC Warrant holder, with subsequent changes in fair value reported in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations.

In addition, the Company analyzed the impact of the aforementioned adjustments on its previously issued audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 and previously issued unaudited consolidated financial statements for the periods ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, June 30, 2020, and March 31, 2020 (such years and periods, the “Affected Periods”). The Company concluded the adjustments are not material to any individual period prior to the period ended March 31, 2021, taking into account the requirements of ASC Topic 250, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, ASC Topic 270, Interim Financial Reporting, ASC Topic 250-S99-1, Assessing Materiality, and ASC Topic 250-S99-2, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements. In accordance with the authoritative guidance, management evaluated the materiality of the adjustments from a quantitative and qualitative perspective. Based on such evaluation, the Company concluded that the effects of these adjustments were not material individually or in the aggregate to the Affected Periods and had no effect on the trend of financial results. While management concluded the adjustment was not material to any prior periods, individually or in the aggregate, based on our qualitative and quantitative analysis, management opted to make the adjustment by revising the respective amounts that were previously reported in the Affected Period. Accordingly, the Company has revised the prior period interim and annual financial information for the Affected Periods to reflect these adjustments.

The Company’s accounting for the Private SPAC Warrants as components of liabilities instead of as equity did not have any effect on the Company’s previously reported operating expenses, total cash flows from operating activities, investing activities, and financing activities, cash or total assets. The impact on the individual line items of the Company’s consolidated balance sheets for each period presented from the adjustment was as follows (in thousands):

 

 

As Previously

Reported

 

 

Adjustments

 

 

As Revised

 

Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long term liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warrant liability

 

 

 

 

 

628

 

 

 

628

 

Total liabilities

 

 

5,722

 

 

 

628

 

 

 

6,350

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

103,599

 

 

 

(187

)

 

 

103,412

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(91,111

)

 

 

(441

)

 

 

(91,552

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

12,489

 

 

 

(628

)

 

 

11,861

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long term liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warrant liability

 

 

 

 

 

1,650

 

 

 

1,650

 

Total liabilities

 

 

6,290

 

 

 

1,650

 

 

 

7,940

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

189,849

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

189,868

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(126,360

)

 

 

(1,669

)

 

 

(128,029

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

63,490

 

 

 

(1,650

)

 

 

61,840

 

The impact on the individual line items of the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for the periods presented from the adjustment was as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2019

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2020

 

 

 

As Previously

Reported

 

 

Adjustments

 

 

As Revised

 

 

As Previously

Reported

 

 

Adjustments

 

 

As Revised

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income/(expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of warrant liability

 

$

 

 

$

(441

)

 

$

(441

)

 

$

 

 

$

(1,228

)

 

$

(1,228

)

Total other income/(expense)

 

 

(2,084

)

 

 

(441

)

 

 

(2,525

)

 

 

40

 

 

 

(1,228

)

 

 

(1,188

)

Net loss

 

$

(19,689

)

 

$

(441

)

 

$

(20,130

)

 

$

(35,249

)

 

$

(1,228

)

 

$

(36,477

)

Net loss per share of common stock

  outstanding, basic and diluted

 

$

(2.81

)

 

$

(0.06

)

 

$

(2.87

)

 

$

(2.08

)

 

$

(0.07

)

 

$

(2.15

)

The consolidated statements of cash flow are not presented because there is no impact on total cash flows from operating activities, investing activities, or financing activities. Certain components of net cash used in operating activities changed, as caused by the revision, such as incorporating the non-cash item from the change in fair value of warrant liability in the adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities, but the net change amounted to zero for the Affected Periods.

Use of Estimates

(d)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires that management make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the amounts of revenues and expenses reported during the period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates these estimates and judgments, including but not limited to, those related to assay revenue, stock-based compensation, short-term marketable securities, accounts receivable, warrant liability, right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and the realization of deferred tax assets. Actual results may differ from those estimates.

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

(e)

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with remaining maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains its cash balances at banks and financial institutions. The balances are insured up to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation legal limit. The Company maintains cash balances that may, at times, exceed this insured limit.

Restricted cash consists of cash deposited with a financial institution as collateral for the Company’s letters of credit for its facility leases. Restricted cash is classified as noncurrent based on the terms of the underlying lease arrangement.

The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash that sum to the total of the same amounts shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2021

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2020

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2019

 

 

 

Beginning of

period

 

 

End of

period

 

 

Beginning of

period

 

 

End of

period

 

 

Beginning of

period

 

 

End of

period

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

24,248

 

 

$

176,882

 

 

$

15,374

 

 

$

24,248

 

 

$

4,753

 

 

$

15,374

 

Restricted cash

 

 

 

 

 

3,025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

   reported in the consolidated statements of

   cash flows

 

$

24,248

 

 

$

179,907

 

 

$

15,374

 

 

$

24,248

 

 

$

4,753

 

 

$

15,374

 

 

Marketable Securities

(f)   Marketable Securities

The Company considers securities with maturities of greater than 90 days at the time of purchase to be marketable securities. The Company has the ability, if necessary, to liquidate any of its cash equivalents and marketable securities to meet its liquidity needs in the next 12 months. Accordingly, such marketable securities are classified as current assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets even if they have contractual maturities greater than one year from the date of purchase. The Company’s marketable securities consist of U.S. Treasury and agency securities, commercial paper, and corporate debt securities. Marketable securities are recorded at fair value and unrealized gains and losses are recorded within accumulated other comprehensive loss. The estimated fair value of the marketable securities is determined based on quoted market prices or rates for similar instruments. The Company evaluates securities with unrealized losses to determine whether such losses, if any, are due to credit-related factors. The Company records an allowance for credit losses when unrealized losses are due to credit-related factors. Realized gains and losses are calculated using the specific identification method and recorded as interest income or expense. The Company does not generally intend to sell the investments and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which

may occur at maturity. The Company has determined that there were no material declines in fair values of its investments due to credit-related factors as of December 31, 2021.

Property and Equipment Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Property and equipment consists mainly of assets such as leasehold improvements, office, computer and laboratory equipment, including laboratory equipment acquired under finance lease arrangements. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from two to five years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the remaining term of the lease or the useful life of the asset. The Company recorded depreciation expense of $1.0 million, $0.5 million, and $0.1 million, for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively, which includes amortization of laboratory equipment acquired under finance leases (previously referred to as “capital leases”) of $0.1 million, $10,000, and zero for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

Amortization of assets that are recorded under finance leases in depreciation expense is included in cost of revenues on the consolidated statement of operations. Gross assets recorded under finance leases were $0.4 million and $0.3 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Accumulated amortization associated with finance leases was $0.1 million and $10,000 as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred, and material improvements are capitalized. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the balance sheet and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in the consolidated statements of operations in the period realized. The Company disposed of $0.1 million, $0.1 million, and zero of equipment during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively. The Company assesses its long-lived assets, consisting primarily of property and equipment, for impairment when material events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. There were no impairment losses for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019.

Leases

(h)

Leases

The Company acts as lessee in its lease agreements, which include operating leases for corporate offices and finance leases for certain laboratory and office equipment.

In accordance with Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), as adopted on January 1, 2021, the Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Finance leases are included in the consolidated balance sheets as property and equipment, net and finance lease obligations at the present value of the lease payments. Operating leases are included in the consolidated balance sheet as ROU assets and operating lease liabilities at the present value of the lease payments. ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent an obligation to make lease payments based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. Classification of lease liabilities as either current or non-current is based on the expected timing of payments due under the Company’s obligations.

As most of the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit interest rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The incremental borrowing rate is the rate of interest that a lessee would have to pay to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term and at an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment. In order to determine the appropriate incremental borrowing rates, the Company has used a number of factors including the credit rating, and the lease term.

The ROU asset also consists of any lease incentives received. The lease terms used to calculate the ROU asset and related lease liability include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. “Reasonably certain” is assessed internally based on economic, industry, company, strategic and contractual factors. The leases have remaining lease terms of less than 2 years to 10 years, some of which include options to extend the lease for up to 10 years. Operating lease expense and amortization of finance lease ROU assets are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term as an operating expense. Finance lease interest expense is recorded as interest income, net on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

The Company has taken advantage of certain practical expedients offered to registrants at adoption of ASC 842. The Company does not apply the recognition requirements of ASC 842 to short-term leases. Instead, those lease payments are recognized in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Further, as a practical expedient, all lease contracts are accounted for as one single lease component, as opposed to separating lease and non-lease components to allocate the consideration within a single lease contract.

Research and Development

(i)

Research and Development

Costs incurred in connection with research and development (“R&D”) activities are expensed as incurred. R&D expenses consist of (i) employee-related expenses, including salaries, benefits, travel and stock-based compensation expense; and (ii) facilities and other expenses, which include direct and allocated expenses for rent and maintenance of facilities and laboratory and other supplies.

The Company expenses all costs as incurred in connection with patent applications (including direct application fees and the legal and consulting expenses related to making such applications), and such costs are included in general and administrative expenses.

Concentration of Credit Risk

(j)

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2021, the Company maintained $100.1 million in a sweep account, which maintains cash balances throughout various interest bearing bank accounts under the $250,000 insurance limit provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for one federally insured financial institution. Approximately $60.2 million was held in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limit as of December 31, 2021. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

Income Taxes

(k)

Income Taxes

The Company provides for federal and state income taxes on the asset and liability approach which requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be recognized based on temporary differences between the consolidated financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse.

Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in management’s opinion, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. The Company’s valuation allowance is based on available evidence, including its current year and prior year operating losses, evaluation of positive and negative evidence with respect to certain specific deferred tax assets including evaluation sources of future taxable income to support the realization of the deferred tax assets. The Company has established a full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2021.

Current and deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the Company’s income tax returns. U.S. GAAP requires that the tax benefits of an uncertain tax position can only be recognized when it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the relevant taxing authority. Tax benefits related to tax positions that do not meet this criterion are not recognized in the consolidated financial statements, of which there are none.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.  

Revenue Recognition

(l)

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s revenue is generated from two revenue streams: contract revenue and assay revenue. The Company accounts for revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). The core principle of ASC 606 is that the Company recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASC 606 revenue recognition model consists of the following five steps: (1) identify the contracts with a customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.  

The Company recognizes revenue from its assay and contract services in accordance with the core principles and key aspects considered by the Company. These considerations are described in detail below, first for Assay Revenue and then for Contract Revenue.

Assay Revenue

The Company generates revenues from its Pigmented Lesion Assay (“PLA”) and PLAplus (now referred to as the “DermTech Melanoma Test” or “DMT”, which may consist at the option of the ordering clinician of either (i) the PLA or (ii) the PLA and PLAplus) it provides to healthcare clinicians throughout the United States to assist in a clinician’s diagnosis of melanoma. The Company provides prescribing clinicians with its Smart Sticker to perform non-invasive skin biopsies of clinically ambiguous pigmented skin lesions on patients. The Company also offers clinicians a telemedicine solution where they can request the Smart Sticker collection kit be sent to the patient’s home for a clinician-guided remote collection on ambiguous pigmented skin lesions. A patient can also initiate the process by downloading the Company’s telemedicine app, DermTech Connect, which uses store-and-forward technology to allow the patient to take a picture of a suspicious lesion with their phone and have the picture reviewed by an independent clinician who is subscribing to the DermTech Connect platform to assess the suspicious lesion, and if medically necessary, order a DMT. The DermTech Connect app and telemedicine service were initially beta tested in Florida and is currently available in a limited number of states where permitted by law and applicable standards of practice guidelines.

Once the sample is collected by the patient via the telemedicine solution or by a healthcare clinician in person, it is returned to the Company’s CLIA laboratory for analysis. The patient’s ribonucleic acid (“RNA”) and deoxyribonucleic acid (“DNA”) are extracted from the Smart Sticker and analyzed using gene expression and sequencing technology to determine if the pigmented skin lesion contains certain genomic features indicative of melanoma. Upon completion of the gene expression analysis, a final report is drafted and provided to the clinician detailing the test results for the pigmented skin lesion indicating whether the sample collected is indicative of melanoma or not.

Contracts

The Company’s customer is the patient. However, the Company does not enter into a formal reimbursement agreement with a patient, as formal reimbursement agreements are more commonly established with insurance payors. Accordingly, the Company establishes an agreement with a patient in accordance with other customary business practices.

 

Approval of an agreement is established by the use of the Company’s Smart Sticker on a patient by an ordering clinician, which is then sent to the Company’s central lab for testing.

 

 

The Company is obligated to perform the Company’s laboratory services upon receipt of a sample from a clinician, and the patient and/or applicable payor are obligated to reimburse the Company for services rendered based on the patient’s insurance benefits.

 

 

Payment terms are a function of a patient’s existing insurance benefits.

 

 

Once the Company delivers a patient’s test result to the ordering physician, the Company is legally able to collect payment and bill an insurer and/or patient, depending on payor agreement status or patient insurance benefit status.

 

 

The Company’s consideration is deemed to be variable, and the Company considers collection of such consideration to be probable to the extent that it is unconstrained.

Performance Obligations

A performance obligation is a promise in an agreement to transfer a distinct good or service (or a bundle of goods or services) to the customer. The customer is able to order a DMT, which is treated as a single performance obligation.

Transaction Price

The transaction price is the amount of consideration that the Company expects to collect in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer, excluding amounts collected on behalf of third parties (for example, some sales taxes). The consideration expected from an agreement with a customer may include fixed amounts, variable amounts, or both.

The consideration derived from the Company’s agreements is deemed to be variable, though the variability is not explicitly stated in any agreement. Rather, the implied variability is due to several factors, such as the amount of contractual adjustments, any patient co-payments, deductibles or patient compliance incentives, the existence of secondary payors and claim denials.

The Company estimates the amount of variable consideration using the expected value method, which represents the sum of probability-weighted amounts in a range of possible consideration amounts. When estimating the amount of variable consideration, the Company considers several factors, such as historical collections experience, patient insurance eligibility and payor reimbursement agreements.

The Company limits the amount of variable consideration included in the transaction price to the unconstrained portion of such consideration. In other words, the Company recognizes revenue up to the amount of variable consideration that is not subject to a significant reversal until additional information is obtained or the uncertainty associated with the additional payments or refunds is subsequently resolved. Differences between original estimates and subsequent revisions, including final settlements, represent changes in the estimate of variable consideration and are included in the period in which such revisions are made. Revenue recognized from changes in transaction prices was not material for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

The Company monitors its estimates of transaction price to depict conditions that exist at each reporting date. If the Company subsequently determines that it will collect more consideration than it originally estimated for an agreement with a patient, it will account for the change as an increase in the estimate of the transaction price (i.e., an upward revenue adjustment) in the period identified. Similarly, if the Company subsequently determines that the amount it expects to collect from a patient is less than it originally estimated, it will generally account for the change as a decrease in the estimate of the transaction price (i.e., a downward revenue adjustment), provided that such downward adjustment does not result in a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognized.

When the Company does not have significant historical experience or that experience has limited predictive value, the constraint over estimates of variable consideration may result in no revenue being recognized upon delivery of a patient’s test result to the ordering physician, with recognition, generally occurring at the date of cash receipt.

Allocate the Transaction Price

The entire transaction price is allocated entirely to the single performance obligation contained within the agreement with a patient.

Recognize Revenue

The Company’s single performance obligation is satisfied at a point in time, and that point in time is defined as the date a patient’s successful test result is delivered to the patient’s ordering physician. The Company considers this date to be the time at which the patient obtains control of the final results of the promised test service.

Contract Revenue

Contract revenue is generated from the sale of laboratory services and Smart Stickers to third-party companies through contract research agreements. Revenues are generated from providing gene expression tests to facilitate the development of drugs designed to treat dermatologic conditions. The provision of gene expression services may include sample collection using the Company’s Smart Sticker, assay development for research partners, RNA extraction, isolation, expression, amplification and detection, including data analysis and reporting.

Contracts

As part of the Company’s contract revenue, the Company has established agreements and work orders with the Company’s third-party partners that fall under the scope of ASC 606.

Performance Obligations

ASC 606 requires an entity to assess the goods or services promised in a contract and identify as a performance obligation each promise to transfer to the customer either a good or service (or a bundle of goods or services) that is distinct, or a series of distinct goods or services that are substantially the same and that have the same pattern of transfer to the customer. Based upon review of existing contracts, a majority of the Company’s contract revenue agreements contain three performance obligations:

 

(1)

Smart Stickers

 

 

(2)

RNA extractions and analysis

 

 

(3)

Certain project management fees

Many of the Company’s contract revenue agreements contain promises such as start-up activities and quality system setup fees, which are activities that the Company performs to fulfill the agreement and they do not transfer any good or service to the customer. These promises encompass the administrative tasks associated with beginning and initiating a new project or study with a third-party company. In accordance with ASC 606, an entity does not account for these activities as a promised good or service within the agreement nor evaluate whether they are a performance obligation. 

Transaction Price

The transaction price is the amount of consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer. The consideration promised in an agreement with a customer may include fixed amounts, variable amounts, or both.

The transaction prices of the Company’s performance obligations are listed in its agreements on a per unit basis and are fixed for adhesive sample collection kits and RNA extractions and analysis. The project management fees are assessed based on a monthly service fee which range within the agreements depending on certain factors which include length of the project and the amount of Smart Stickers or RNA extractions and analysis promised within the agreement. The fixed and variable rates are materially consistent within the Company’s agreements. Therefore, the Company utilizes the prices listed in our agreements as the transaction price for each performance obligation.

In determining the transaction price, ASC 606 requires an entity to adjust the promised amount of consideration for the effects of the time value of money if the agreement contains a significant financing component. The Company’s agreements state fixed transaction prices for each deliverable associated with the agreement and do not qualify for the significant financing component of ASC 606.

Allocate the Transaction Price

The Company’s contracts have a directly observable transaction price pertaining to each promised good or service. Those prices are consistent across agreements for Smart Stickers and RNA extractions and analysis, with the exception of the Company’s project management fees, which the Company’s believes encompass a sufficiently narrow range of prices that are dictated upon factors of each agreement previously discussed above. Therefore, the Company relies on those transaction prices as the basis to allocate the stand-alone selling prices to the performance obligations of the agreement.

Most of the Company’s agreements contain a discount that is allocated to items within the agreement, whether they are performance obligations or not. Those items that are not performance obligations (e.g., quality system setup and start up fees) have the associated discount allocated to the transaction prices of the performance obligations evenly.

Recognize Revenue

An entity should recognize revenue when (or as) it satisfies a performance obligation by transferring a promised good or service to a customer. A good or service is transferred when (or as) the customer obtains control of that good or service. The Smart Stickers are recognized at a point in time when shipped to the customer. The RNA extraction and analysis are recognized at a point in time when the extraction and analysis process is complete and the results are sent to the customer. The Company provides its project management service over the life of the agreement, providing equal benefit to the customer throughout the life of the project or study. Therefore, the revenue related to the Company’s project management fees is recognized straight-line over the life of the agreement.

 

(a)

Disaggregation of Revenue

The following table presents the Company’s revenues disaggregated by revenue source during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively (in thousands):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Assay Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DermTech Melanoma Test

 

$

11,023

 

 

$

4,241

 

 

$

1,403

 

Contract Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Smart Stickers

 

 

348

 

 

 

213

 

 

 

476

 

RNA extractions

 

 

300

 

 

 

1,172

 

 

 

626

 

Project management fees

 

 

166

 

 

 

258

 

 

 

336

 

Other

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

523

 

Total revenues

 

$

11,838

 

 

$

5,885

 

 

$

3,364

 

 

 

The following table sets forth the percentages of total revenue or accounts receivable for the Company’s third-party payors and pharmaceutical customers that represent 10% or more of the respective amounts for the periods shown:

 

 

 

Total Revenue

 

 

Accounts Receivable

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Assay Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payor A

 

 

36

%

 

 

32

%

 

*

 

 

 

23

%

 

 

21

%

Payor B

 

*

 

 

 

11

%

 

 

12

%

 

 

15

%

 

*

 

Contract Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer A

 

*

 

 

 

23

%

 

 

22

%

 

*

 

 

*

 

Customer B

 

*

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

 

 

17

%

Customer C

 

*

 

 

*

 

 

 

29

%

 

*

 

 

*

 

* Less than 10%

There were no other payors or customers that individually accounted for more than 10% of total revenue or accounts receivable for the periods shown in the table above.

(b)

Deferred Revenue and Remaining Performance Obligations

The timing of revenue recognition, billings and cash collections results in billed accounts receivable and deferred revenue on the consolidated balance sheets.

In a majority of agreements that produce contract revenue, the Company receives a substantial up-front payment and additional payments upon the achievement of various milestones over the life of the agreement. This results in deferred revenue and is relieved upon delivery of the applicable Smart Stickers or RNA extraction results. Changes in accounts receivable and deferred revenue were not materially impacted by any other factors.

The Company records a deferred revenue liability if a customer pays consideration before the Company transfers a good or service to the customer. Deferred revenue primarily represents upfront milestone payments, for which consideration is received prior to when goods/services are completed or delivered. Upfront fees that are estimated to be recognized as revenue more than one year from the date of collection are classified as long-term deferred revenue. Short-term deferred revenue as of December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020, was $1.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively. Long-term deferred revenue as of December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020, was zero and $0.6 million, respectively.

Remaining performance obligations include deferred revenue and amounts the Company expects to receive for goods and services that have not yet been delivered or provided under existing agreements. For agreements that have an original duration of one year or less, the Company has elected the practical expedient applicable to such agreements and does not disclose the remaining performance obligations at the end of each reporting period. As of December 31, 2021, the estimated revenue expected to be recognized in future periods related to performance obligations that are unsatisfied for executed agreements with an original duration of one year or more was approximately $0.4 million. The Company expects to recognize revenue on the majority of these remaining performance obligations over the next two to three years.

Accounts Receivable

(m)

Accounts Receivable

Assay Accounts Receivable

Due to the nature of the Company’s assay revenue, it can take a significant amount of time to collect upon billed tests. The Company prepares an analysis on reimbursement collections and data obtained for each financial reporting period to determine the amount of receivables to be recorded relating to tests performed in the applicable period. The Company generally does not perform evaluations of customers’ financial condition and generally does not require collateral. Accounts receivable are written off when all efforts to collect the balance have been exhausted. Adjustments for implicit price concessions attributable to variable consideration are incorporated into the measurement of the accounts receivable balances. The Company recorded $3.6 million and $1.0 million of gross assay accounts receivable as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Contract Accounts Receivable

Contract accounts receivable are recorded at the net invoice value and are not interest bearing. The Company reserves specific receivables if collectability is no longer reasonably assured, and as of December 31, 2021, the Company did not maintain any reserves over contract receivables as they relate to large established credit worthy customers. The Company re-evaluates such reserves on a regular basis and adjusts its reserves as needed. Once a receivable is deemed to be uncollectible, such balance is charged against the

reserve. The Company recorded $0.2 million and $0.5 million of contract accounts receivable as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Freight and Shipping Costs

(n)

Freight and Shipping Costs

The Company records outbound freight and shipping costs for its contract and assay revenues in cost of revenues.

Comprehensive Loss

(o)

Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive loss is defined as a change in equity during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. We report net loss and the components of other comprehensive loss, including unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities, net of their related tax effect to arrive at total comprehensive loss.

Segment Reporting

(p)

Segment Reporting

Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in making decisions on how to allocate resources and assess performance. The Company views its operations and manages its business as one operating segment.

Net Loss Per Share

(q)

Net Loss Per Share

Basic and diluted net loss per share is determined by dividing net loss applicable to holders of common stock by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Because there is a net loss attributable to holders of common stock during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the outstanding common stock warrants, stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) have been excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share of common stock because their effect would be anti-dilutive. Therefore, the weighted average shares used to calculate both basic and diluted loss per share are the same. Diluted net loss per share of common stock for the year ended December 31, 2021 excludes the effect of anti-dilutive equity instruments including 734,329 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding common stock warrants and 2,704,035 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise stock options and release of RSUs. Diluted net loss per share of common stock for the year ended December 31, 2020 excludes the effect of anti-dilutive equity instruments including 3,885,311 shares of common stock then issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants and 2,112,980 shares of common stock then issuable upon the exercise of stock options and release of RSUs. Diluted net loss per common share for the year ended December 31, 2019 excludes the effect of anti-dilutive equity instruments including 615,385 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Company’s preferred stock, 4,200,497 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding common stock warrants and 443,547 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise stock options. The Company did not consider a two-class method of loss per share given that the Company’s convertible participating securities do not participate in losses.

Stock-Based Compensation

(r)

Stock-Based Compensation

Compensation costs associated with stock option awards and other forms of equity compensation are measured at the grant-date fair value of the awards and recognized over the requisite service period of the awards on a ratable basis.

The Company grants stock options to purchase common stock to employees with exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock. The fair market value of stock options is based on the closing stock price on the grant date.

The fair value of each stock option award is estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model. Such value is recognized as expense over the requisite service period using the ratable method. The expected term of options is based on the simplified method which defines the expected term as the average of the contractual term of the options and the weighted average vesting period for all option tranches. The expected volatility of stock options is based upon the historical volatility of a number of related publicly traded companies in similar stages of development as well as the volatility of the Company’s common stock. The risk-free interest rate is based on the average yield of U.S. Treasury securities with remaining terms similar to the expected term of the share-based awards. The assumed dividend yield was based on the Company’s expectation of not paying dividends in the foreseeable future.

The Company accounts for stock options to non-employees using the fair value approach. The fair value of these options is measured using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model, reflecting the same assumptions applied to employee options, other than expected life, which is assumed to be the remaining contractual life of the award. Options that are granted to employees generally have a requisite service period of three to four years.

RSUs are considered restricted stock. The fair market value of RSUs is based on the closing stock price on the grant date. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense based on the fair value on a ratable basis over the requisite service periods of the awards. RSUs that are granted to employees have a requisite service period typically between two and four years.

All stock options and RSUs granted prior to January 1, 2020 will maintain the estimated forfeiture approach and will be recognized over the requisite service period using the straight-line method.

The following table sets forth assumptions used to determine the fair value of each option on the date of grant issued under the 2020 Equity Incentive Plan:

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Assumed risk-free interest rate

 

0.52% - 1.39%

 

 

0.36% - 1.69%

 

 

1.68% - 2.50%

 

Assumed volatility

 

74.88% - 83.32%

 

 

64.03% - 73.44%

 

 

72.30% - 73.50%

 

Expected option term

 

6.08 years

 

 

5.04 - 6.25 years

 

 

6.02 - 6.08 years

 

Expected dividend yield

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following table sets forth assumptions used to determine the fair value of the purchase rights issued under the 2020 Employee Stock Purchase Plan:

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Assumed risk-free interest rate

 

0.05% - 0.18%

 

 

0.18%

 

Assumed volatility

 

64.55% - 69.34%

 

 

68.44%

 

Expected option term

 

0.49 - 0.50 years

 

 

0.49 years

 

Expected dividend yield

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense for employee options, RSUs, the purchase rights issued under the 2020 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), and consultant options of $13.3 million, $5.0 million, and $1.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively. The total compensation cost related to non-vested awards not yet recognized as of December 31, 2021 was $38.4 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average term of 2.83 years. 

Warrant Liability

(s) Warrant Liability

The Company accounts for warrants as either equity-classified or liability-classified instruments based on an assessment of the warrant’s specific terms and applicable authoritative guidance in FASB ASC Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (“ASC 480”) and ASC 815-40. The assessment considers whether the warrants are freestanding financial instruments pursuant to ASC 480, meet the definition of a liability pursuant to ASC 480, and whether the warrants meet all of the requirements for equity classification under ASC 815-40, including whether the warrants are indexed to the Company’s own common stock, among other conditions for equity classification. This assessment, which requires the use of professional judgment, is conducted at the time of warrant issuance and as of each subsequent quarterly period end date while the warrants are outstanding.

For issued or modified warrants that meet all of the criteria for equity classification, the warrants are required to be recorded as a component of additional paid-in capital at the time of issuance. For issued or modified warrants that do not meet all the criteria for equity classification, the warrants classified as liabilities and are required to be recorded at their initial fair value on the date of issuance, and each balance sheet date thereafter. Changes in the estimated fair value of the warrants are recognized as a component of other income/(expense) in the consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of the warrants is estimated using a Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model. The Company will continue to adjust the liability for changes in fair value until the earlier of the exercise or expiration of its warrants. At that time, the portion of the warrant liability related to the Company’s warrants will be reclassified to additional paid-in capital.

The following assumptions were used to calculate the fair value of the Company’s warrant liability using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model:

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Assumed risk-free interest rate

 

0.46% - 0.85%

 

 

0.22% - 0.33%

 

 

1.40% - 1.66%

 

Assumed volatility

 

85.85% - 90.70%

 

 

69.79% - 79.26%

 

 

64.06% - 66.68%

 

Expected term

 

2.66 - 3.42 years

 

 

3.66 - 4.42 years

 

 

4.67 - 5.00 years

 

Expected dividend yield

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements

(t) Fair Value Measurements

The Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company uses a three-tier fair value hierarchy to prioritize the inputs used in the Company’s fair value measurements. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. The following table provides a summary of the assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands):

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash equivalents

 

$

16,380

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

16,380

 

Restricted cash

 

 

3,025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marketable securities, available for sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

 

 

 

15,352

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,352

 

Municipal securities

 

 

 

 

 

7,412

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,412

 

U.S. government debt securities

 

 

 

 

 

25,685

 

 

 

 

 

 

25,685

 

Total marketable securities, available for sale

 

 

 

 

 

48,449

 

 

 

 

 

 

48,449

 

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis

 

$

19,405

 

 

$

48,449

 

 

$

 

 

$

64,829

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warrant liability

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

146

 

 

$

146

 

Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

146

 

 

$

146

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash equivalents

 

$

448

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

448

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marketable securities, available for sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

 

 

 

8,940

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,940

 

Municipal securities

 

 

 

 

 

7,324

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,324

 

U.S. government debt securities

 

 

 

 

 

23,265

 

 

 

 

 

 

23,265

 

Total marketable securities, available for sale

 

 

 

 

 

39,529

 

 

 

 

 

 

39,529

 

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis

 

$

448

 

 

$

39,529

 

 

$

 

 

$

39,977

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warrant liability

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,650

 

 

$

1,650

 

Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,650

 

 

$

1,650

 

 

The Company’s marketable debt securities are classified as available-for-sale securities based on management's intentions and are at level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, as these investment securities are valued based upon quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active. The Company has classified marketable securities with original maturities of greater than one year as short-term investments based upon the Company’s ability to use all of those marketable securities to satisfy the liquidity needs of the Company’s current operations.

The fair value of the Private SPAC Warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model and included an unobservable input: expected volatility. Expected volatility is considered by the Company to be an unobservable input and is calculated using a weighted average of historical volatilities of a combination of the Company and peer companies, due to the lack of sufficient historical data of the Company’s own stock price. The model also incorporated several observable assumptions at each valuation date including: the price of the Company’s common stock on the date of valuation, the remaining contractual term of the warrant and the risk-free interest rate over the remaining term.

The following table summarizes the changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 liabilities (in thousands):

 

Balance as of December 31, 2019

 

$

628

 

Reclassification of warrant liability due to Private SPAC Warrants not held by original holder

 

 

(206

)

Change in fair value of warrant liability

 

 

1,228

 

Balance as of December 31, 2020

 

 

1,650

 

Derecognition of warrant liability from exercise of Private SPAC Warrants

 

 

(2,158

)

Reclassification of warrant liability due to Private SPAC Warrants not held by original holder

 

 

(434

)

Change in fair value of warrant liability

 

 

1,088

 

Balance as of December 31, 2021

 

$

146

 

As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company maintains letters of credit of $3.0 million and zero, respectively, related to its lease arrangements, which are secured by money market accounts in accordance with certain of our lease agreements. The amounts are recorded at fair value using Level 1 inputs and included as restricted cash in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

The Company believes the carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their estimated fair values due to the short-term nature of these accounts.

Accounting Pronouncement Recently Adopted

(u)

Accounting Pronouncement Recently Adopted

In February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”), which supersedes FASB ASC Topic 840, Leases (“ASC 840”), and provides principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both lessees and lessors. The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method for finance leases or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease for operating leases. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months regardless of classification. Leases with a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases.

Since the Company is no longer an emerging growth company as of December 31, 2021, the Company adopted ASC 842 during the third quarter of 2021 effective as of January 1, 2021. The Company has applied its transition provisions at the beginning of the period of adoption (i.e., on the effective date), and so did not restate comparative periods. Under this transition provision, the Company has applied the legacy guidance under ASC 840, including its disclosure requirements, in the comparative periods presented.

Adoption of ASU 2016-02 did not result in a cumulative adjustment to the Company’s accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2021. Adoption of ASU 2016-02 resulted in the recording of an operating lease ROU assets and lease liabilities of $2.8 million and $3.1 million, respectively. The difference between the operating lease ROU assets and lease liabilities are due to accrued deferred rent and unamortized lease incentives. Finance lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities recognized as of January 1, 2021, included preexisting assets and liabilities of $0.3 million, related to finance leases accounted for under ASC 840. Adoption of ASU 2016-02 did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or cash flows.

The Company elected to use the transition package of three practical expedients, which among other things, allowed the Company to carry forward the historical lease classification. The Company has elected, under ASC 842, the further practical expedient not to separate non-lease components from the lease components to which they relate and instead to combine them and account for them as a single lease component. The Company also elected the accounting policy election to keep leases with a term of 12 months or less off the balance sheet and to recognize payments for those leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The underlying assets of the Company’s leases as of the adoption date consisted of operating facilities and laboratory equipment.

Judgment was exercised in the application of ASC 842 with respect to the determination of whether a contract contains a lease. While the ability to control and direct the use of an identified asset indicates that the contract, or portion of a contract, is a lease, a counterparty’s substantive substitution rights typically provide evidence that a lessee does not control the asset. Judgment was also exercised with respect to the determination of the discount rate used to determine the present value of lease payments. The Company’s leases generally do not provide an implicit rate, and therefore the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate as the discount rate when measuring lease liabilities. The incremental borrowing rate represents an estimate of the interest rate the Company would incur at lease commencement to borrow an amount equal to the lease payments on a collateralized basis over the term of a lease within a similar economic environment. The Company has no debt and has not had an established incremental borrowing rate. For the purpose of

estimating the incremental borrowing rate in the adoption of ASC 842, required management judgment including the development of a synthetic credit rating and cost of debt as we currently do not carry any debt. The Company calculates its incremental borrowing rates for specific lease terms, used to discount future lease payments, as a function of the U.S. Treasury rate and an indicative Moody’s rating for operating leases.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial InstrumentsCredit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (Topic 326) (“ASU 2016-13”), which amends the impairment model by requiring entities to use a forward-looking approach based on expected losses to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments, including trade receivables and available-for-sale debt securities. Previously, when credit losses were measured under U.S. GAAP, an entity generally only considered past events and current conditions in measuring the incurred loss. The new guidance requires companies to identify, analyze, document and support new methodologies for quantifying expected credit loss estimates for financial instruments, using information such as historical experience and current economic conditions, plus the use of reasonable supportable forecast information. 

Since the Company is no longer an emerging growth company as of December 31, 2021, the Company adopted the guidance under ASU 2016-13 during the fourth quarter of 2021 and applied the modified retrospective method of adoption to the Company’s financial statements as of January 1, 2021. Based on the composition of its trade receivables, investment portfolio and other financial assets, current economic conditions and historical credit loss activity, the adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements and related disclosures and no cumulative adjustment was required to be recorded to the Company’s accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2021.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASU 2019-12”). ASU 2019-12 is a new accounting standard to simplify accounting for income taxes and remove, modify, and add to the disclosure requirements of income taxes. The Company adopted this guidance during the fourth quarter of 2021 with no material impact to the Company's consolidated financial statements.

 

Accounting Pronouncements Issued But Not Yet Effective

(v)

Accounting Pronouncements Issued But Not Yet Effective

In May 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2021-04, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Debt—Modifications and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718), and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Issuer’s Accounting for Certain Modifications or Exchanges of Freestanding Equity-Classified Written Call Options (“ASU 2021-04”). ASU 2021-04 provides guidance to clarify and reduce diversity in an issuer’s accounting for modifications or exchanges of freestanding equity-classified written call options (for example, warrants) that remain equity classified after modification or exchange. The amendments in ASU 2021-04 are effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. An entity should apply the amendments prospectively to modifications or exchanges occurring on or after the effective date of the amendments. The Company plans to adopt the standard on January 1, 2022. The Company is currently evaluating the effects, if any, of the adoption of ASU 2021-04 guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.