Commitments and Contingencies |
6 Months Ended |
|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2017 | |
| Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract] | |
| COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | NOTE 11 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
On April 7, 2016, the Company executed an agreement with a third party to provide certain services for the Company. The agreement requires 1% of the outstanding common share equivalent to be issued to the third party when the market capitalization of the Company reaches $500,000,000 and an additional 1% when it reached $750,000,000. The probability of this event is uncertain at present and the Company has not accrued a contingent loss as of June 30, 2017, or December 31, 2016 as a result.
On October 14, 2014, one of our operating subsidiaries, NxtGn, Inc. and Next Communications, Inc., an entity controlled by our CEO, (collectively the “Plaintiffs”) filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern district of New York against Viber Media, Inc. Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint asserting four claims: misappropriation of a business idea, misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment. Viber moved the Court to dismiss the Amended Complaint. On March 30, 2016, U.S. District Judge Richard Sullivan issued an opinion and order on Viber’s motion to Dismiss. Specifically, Judge Sullivan ordered that Viber’s motion to dismiss is granted on Plaintiffs’ misappropriation of a business idea claim, but denied as to their misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment claims. The Company has not accrued any gains or losses associated with this case as it would be a contingent gain and recorded when received.
On September 20, 2016, the Company received a notice it has been named as a defendant in a suit brought against Next Communications, an entity controlled by our CEO. In addition to being named a defendant, it was requested the Company provide certain documents for the discovery process. Due to the original suit being filed against a related party and not against the Company or its subsidiaries, we believe it likely the Company and its subsidiaries be dismissed as defendants and has not accrued a contingent loss as of June 30, 2017 as a result.
On July 6, 2017, the Company received notice an existing legal claim against Accent InterMedia (“AIM”) had been amended to include claims against the Company. The claims brought against the Company include failure to comply with certain judgments for collection of funds by the plaintiff while having a controlling interest in AIM via its ownership of Transaction Processing Products (“TPP”). The Company believes the amended case is without merit and that, per its agreement to sell its interest in TPP, any claims brought against AIM or TPP would be the responsibilities of the current interest holders. Due to the original suit being filed against AIM and amended to include the Company after it disposed of its interest in TPP, which had a controlling interest in AIM, we believe it likely the Company and its subsidiaries be dismissed as defendants. As a result, no contingent loss as been accrued as of June 30, 2017. |