SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block]
A.
Basis of presentation:
 
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) applied on a consistent basis.
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block]
B.
Use of estimates:
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Foreign Currency Transactions and Translations Policy [Policy Text Block]
C.
Financial statements in U.S. dollars:
 
The functional currency of the Company is the U.S dollar ("dollar") since the dollar is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the Company has operated and expects to continue to operate in the foreseeable future. Part of the transactions of BCT is recorded in new Israeli shekels ("NIS"); however, a substantial portion of BCT’s costs are incurred in dollars or linked to the dollar. Accordingly, management has designated the dollar as the currency of BCT’s primary economic environment and thus it is their functional and reporting currency.
 
Transactions and balances denominated in dollars are presented at their original amounts. Non-dollar transactions and balances have been re-measured to dollars in accordance with the provisions of ASC 830-10 (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standard 52), "Foreign Currency Translation". All transaction gains and losses from re-measurement of monetary balance sheet items denominated in non-dollar currencies are reflected in the statement of operations as financial income or expenses, as appropriate.
Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block]
D.
Principles of consolidation:
 
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, BCT and Brainstorm UK. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block]
E.
Cash and cash equivalents:
 
Cash equivalents are short-term highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to cash with maturities of three months or less as of the date acquired.
Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block]
F.
Property and equipment:
 
Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.
 
The annual depreciation rates are as follows:
 
 
 
%
 
 
 
 
 
Office furniture and equipment
 
7
 
Computer software and electronic equipment
 
33
 
Laboratory equipment
 
15
 
Leasehold improvements
 
Over the shorter of the lease term (including the option) or useful life
 
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block]
 
G.
Impairment of long-lived assets:
 
The Company’s long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment in accordance with ASC 360-10 (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standard 144), "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to the future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds their fair value. During 2014 and 2013, no impairment losses were identified.
Severance Pay Policy [Policy Text Block]
H.
Accrued post-employment benefit
 
The Company entered into an employment agreement with its CEO which contains provisions for severance pay under certain circumstances. If the CEO is terminated by the Company without Cause (as defined in the agreement) or if the CEO terminates employment with Good Reason (as defined in the agreement), the CEO will be entitled to (i) his base salary for between 4 and 9 months (depending on length of employment before termination), (ii) his bonus compensation that he would have been entitled to during this payment period, (iii) the immediate vesting of any options that would have vested within the 6 month period following termination and (iv) health insurance benefits during the payment period. If the CEO's employment is terminated in connection with a Change of Control (as defined in the agreement), the CEO will be entitled to (i) his base salary for 12 months, (ii) his target bonus compensation for the year in which the Change of Control occurred and (iii) immediate vesting of all options granted to the CEO. In accordance with ASC 712, no severance liability has been recorded on the Company's balance sheet with respect to this employment agreement as of December 31, 2014.
The majority of the Company's employees in Israel have agreed to Section 14 of Israel's Severance Pay Law, 5723-1963 (“Section 14”). Pursuant to Section 14, those of the Company's employees that are covered by this section are entitled only to an amount of severance pay equal to monthly deposits, at a rate of 8.33% of their monthly salary, made on their behalf by the Company. Payments in accordance with Section 14 release the Company from any future severance liabilities in respect of those employees. Neither severance pay liability nor severance pay funds under Section 14 for such employees is recorded on the Company's balance sheet.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block]
I.
Fair value of financial instruments:
 
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and prepaid expenses, trade payables and other accounts payable approximate their fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments.
 
The Company utilizes the Black Scholes Merton formula to measure the fair value of the warrants issued. The assumptions included in the Black-Scholes model were: (i) the market price of the Company's shares; (ii) the exercise price of the warrant; (iii) risk-free interest; (iv) term available to exercise or redeem the security and (v) the volatility of the shares during the relevant term. The Company determines the volatility of its shares using daily historical quotes of the shares. The risk free interest rate is determined as the interest rate on governmental bonds with maturity commensurate with the term of the warrant.
Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block]
J.
Accounting for stock-based compensation:
 
In accordance with ASC 718-10 (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 123 (Revised 2004)) the Company estimates the fair value of equity-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods in the Company's consolidated statement of operations.
 
The Company recognizes compensation expense for the value of non-employee awards, which have graded vesting, based on the straight-line method over the requisite service period of each award.
 
The Company recognizes compensation expense for the value of employee awards that have graded vesting, based on the straight-line method over the requisite service period of each of the awards, net of estimated forfeitures.
 
The Company estimates the fair value of restricted shares based on the market price of the shares at the grant date and estimates the fair value of stock options granted using a Black-Scholes options pricing model. The option-pricing model requires a number of assumptions, of which the most significant are, expected stock price volatility and the expected option term (the time from the grant date until the options are exercised or expire). Expected volatility was calculated based upon actual historical stock price movements over the period, equal to the expected option term. The Company has historically not paid dividends and has no foreseeable plans to issue dividends. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield from U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bonds with an equivalent term.   
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block]
K.
Basic and diluted net loss per share:
 
Basic net loss per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each year. Diluted net loss per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each year, plus the dilutive potential of the Common Stock considered outstanding during the year, in accordance with ASC 260-10 (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standard 128), "Earnings per Share".
 
All outstanding stock options and warrants have been excluded from the calculation of the diluted loss per share for the year ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, since all such securities have an anti-dilutive effect.
Research and Development Expense, Policy [Policy Text Block]
L.
Research and development expenses, net:
 
Research and development expenses, are charged to the statement of operations as incurred.
 
Royalty-bearing grants from the Government of Israel for funding approved research and development projects are recognized at the time the Company is entitled to such grants, on the basis of the costs incurred and applied as a deduction from research and development expenses. Such grants are included as a deduction of research and development costs since at the time received it is not probable the Company will generate sales from these projects and pay the royalties resulting from such sales.
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block]
M.
Income taxes:
 
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740-10 (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standard 109), "Accounting for Income Taxes." This Statement requires the use of the liability method of accounting for income taxes, whereby deferred tax asset and liability account balances are determined based on the differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The Company and BCT provide a valuation allowance, if necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to their estimated realizable value.
Reverse Stock Split Policy [Policy Text Block]
N. Reverse Stock Split
 
On September 15, 2014, the Company completed the reverse stock split, whereby each fifteen shares of Common Stock of the Company were combined and were reclassified into one share of Common Stock of the Company, and the number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company was proportionally reduced, in both cases without any change to the authorized number of shares of Common Stock or in the par value of such shares.
 
Upon implementation of the recapitalization described above, the Company adjusted all ordinary shares, options, warrants, per share data and exercise prices included in these financial statements for all periods presented to reflect the reverse stock split.
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]
O. Recent Accounting Standards
 
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued a new standard to achieve a consistent application of revenue recognition within the U.S., resulting in a single revenue model to be applied by reporting companies under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Under the new model, recognition of revenue occurs when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the new standard requires that reporting companies disclose the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The new standard is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of 2017; early adoption is prohibited. The new standard is required to be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying it recognized at the date of initial application. As the Company has not incurred revenues to date, it is unable to determine the expected impact of the new standard on its consolidated financial statements.
 
In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued a new standard which eliminates the concept of a development-stage entity from U.S. GAAP as well as the related requirement to present inception-to-date information. Following the issuance of this standard, inception-to-date information is no longer presented in the Company's financial statements.
 
In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued a new standard which provides guidance on determining when and how reporting entities must disclose going-concern uncertainties in their financial statements. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date of issuance of the entity’s financial statements. Further, an entity must provide certain disclosures if there is a substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The new standard did not impact the outcome of the Company's assessment with respect to its ability to continue as a going concern.